just a small collection of not-really compliments: 1. you talk fast but it seems to work for you –steve folmar 2. you use small words it seems to work for you –derrick matthews 3. you use run-on sentences but it seems to work for you -pop
Monthly Archives: October 2014
planning for qualitative data collection and analysis
this blog reflects conversations and on-going work with both mike frick (@mwfrick), shagun sabarwal (@shagunsabarwal), and urmy shukla (@urmy_shukla) — they should receive no blame if this blog is wacky and plenty of credit if it is not. a recent post by monkey cage contributors on the washington post, then summarized by BITSS, asked/suggested whetherContinue reading “planning for qualitative data collection and analysis”
Doing research? Spend more time with program staff…
Originally posted on Suvojit Chattopadhyay:
From Duncan’s blog covering the paper ‘Using Participatory Process Evaluation to Understand the Dynamics of Change in a Nutrition Education Programme’, by Andrea Cornwall While it is always interesting to hear about interesting approaches to data collection and analysis – and a lot of this feeds into thoughts/reactions I had while…
small thoughts on transparency in research (descriptions of methods, analysis)
there is currently a good deal of attention on transparency of social science research – as there should be. much of this is focused on keeping the analysis honest, including pre-analysis plans (e.g.) and opening up data for re-analysis (internal replication, e.g. here and here). some of this will hopefully receive good discussion at anContinue reading “small thoughts on transparency in research (descriptions of methods, analysis)”
Heather E. Lanthorn 